NameJet.com the aftermarket domain name auction company, has developed, in conjunction with WillowTree Apps, a new bidding application for iOS.
The app has an easy-to-use interface, allowing customers to manage their bids, putting them in control of their auctions regardless of location.
Matt Overman, General Manager of NameJet said, “We are always looking for new and innovative ways to improve our customers’ experience. This new app makes it easier for them to bid from their phones and never forget a closing auction.”
Some notable features of the app are:
List My Current Auctions
Last Minute Board
Sort By Domain, Time Left, and High Bid
Place Proxy Bids
Real Time Status Updates
Alert Settings for Auction Starting, Auction Ending, Reserve Met, Outbid, and Auction Closing
Optional Push Notifications
Customer Service Connect
The new NameJet bidding app is now available for free download at the iTunes Store.
TLD Registry Ltd the registry for Dot Chinese Online (.在线) and Dot Chinese Website (.中文网) has released a new tool to help domain investors who do not speak Chinese (guys like me) to find available domains in Chinese.
The New tool is ChineseLandrush.com .
“ChineseLandrush.com is an innovative new way to help non-Chinese speakers to understand and invest in Chinese domains.
At ChineseLandrush.com, visitors will always find 500 great, hand-made domain name suggestions.
The suggestions are not yet registered, and they’re not registry-reserved.
The 500 domain name suggestions are yours for the taking.
Our suggestions are hand-made by our team of Chinese domain experts in Beijing, Hong Kong and New York. For ChineseLandrush.com we never use automated “domain spinning” tools. Our domain suggestions encompass categories from activities, sports and hobbies, common phrases, food, geographic, immigration and travel, medical, and more than a dozen other relevant categories.
If you register a free account and log-into ChineseLandrush.com, you have access to our powerful custom list tool. You can add your domain choices to your cart, and “check out” by downloading a handy spreadsheet file. Then, you can easily copy-and-paste your list into the bulk-registration page at the domain registrar of your choice.
Every night, our automated systems scan yesterday’s domain registrations and cleanse the suggestions database of new domains. The list of 500 domain suggestions is then replenished from our “hopper” of several thousand hand-made suggestions.””
According to the registry “Since their public launch ten weeks ago, Dot Chinese Online (.在线) and Dot Chinese Website (.中文网) have rocketed to the number 1 and 2 positions in namestats‘ “Internationalized Domain Names” (IDN) leaderboard.”
“Many of the world’s most successful domain name investors have already bought our domains. In fact, our first premium domain name auction, held in Macau in April, is still the most successful in ICANN’s new gTLD program (we raised USD184,000 for 33 domain name lots). And during our first month of general availability, more than $580,000 in Dot Chinese Online & Dot Chinese Website domains were sold to end-users and investors.”
You can read more about the tool and the registry here
One of the two new sites that server up new gTLD stats, NameStat.org has made some changes to its ranking system for new gTLD registration.
The service has dropped all free .XYZ domain names given out by Network Solutions (actually all Network Solution .XYZ registrations) and all Domain Names registered by Frank Schilling’s North Sound Names in extensions owned by Frank Schilling’s Uniregistry in computing its Best Selling gTLD list.
NameStat.org is now showing .XYZ with just under 15,000 registrations dropping it from the top 10.
ntldstats.com shows .XYZ being the most registered string with now over 104,000 registrations, almost 85% or over 88K coming from Network Solutions
According to NameStat.org, .XYZ is sitting at number 14 on the list of most registered new gTLD’s with just under 15,000 registrations
Likewise NameStat.org has removed all domain registrations made by North Sound Names for Uniregistry strings .Link, .Sexy and .Tattoo
According to NameStat.org Best Selling gTLD list, .Link is now 33rd on the list with 7,676 registrations while .Sexy is number 28 with 8,503 registrations and .Tattoo is now where to be found in the top 50 which is at the moment which is the biggest list that NameStat.org currently offers
According to ntldstats.com, .link is number 8 with over 32,000 registrations and .Sexy is number 18 with over 14,000 registrations and .Tattoo is number 39 with almost 6,300 registrations
With the removal of .XYZ Network Solutions registrations on NameStat.org., Club is back on top with over 68,000 registrations, with .Guru, .Berlin .Photography and the IDS China Online rounds out the top 5.
However NameStat.org has not removed the Network Solutions or the domain registrations from North Sound Names from the total amount of new gTLD registered, which they have at, 1,036,530 while ntldstats.com has the total number of new gTLD registrations at 1,050,605 (difference in timing of the last update and how Zone files are pulled)
Here are the top 20 Best Selling New gTLD’s according to NameStat.org:
|.newdomain||Total Reg [?]||+ [?]|
We just came across another site offering new gTLD stats at Namestat.org
The site offers a section entitled “Fastest Growing gTLD’s and not surprisingly .Club is leading the way.
Here are the top 10 Fastest Growing new gTLD’s according to the site:
Interestingly the second or third gTLD with the most registrations, .Berlin is not on the list nor is .Expert that just launched last week and has over 10,000 registrations in a week, not sure how that is not on the top 10 fastest growing list.
According to Namestat.org there are 772,939 new gTLD registered.
According to Ntldstats.com, there are 784,537 new gTLD registered
NameStat.org has .Club in the 2nd spot just ahead of .Berlin while Ntldstats.com has club trailing .Berlin by less than 500 registrations.
We are going to stick with Ntldstats.com as the authority for new gTLD numbers for now.
The domain name NameStat.org, was updated last month and is registered under privacy at Internet.Bs
Last week we wrote about a new product called the Serial Cybersquatter Detector (SCD) Network powered by DomainTools® and being run and marketed by Maccabim.com.
As we expressed in the original post we had some issues a company using an automated system to to identify “Serial Cybersquatters” so we reached out to Jonathan Matkowsky, the Founder & CEO of Maccabim.com Ltd. who was nice enough to answer our questions and give some details about the new service.
Your service says you identify serial cybersquatters
1. So what is your definition of a serial cybersquatters?
Is it based on number of UDRP cases filed or lost, lawsuits, domain registrations and so how many lost cases UDRP’s filed IDRP’s or registered domains?
“”The Network identifies domain registrants with a number of different known trademarks in their portfolio, indicating a pattern or practice of registering trademark words and/or typosquats for illegitimate profit.
Such registrants are unlikely to have a legitimate explanation for having a large number of domains that are substantially indistinguishable or confusingly similar to a large number of trademarks.
Therefore, from our point of view, these are more likely to be bad faith actors.
This patent-pending investigative and networking tool gives brand owners the opportunity to collaborate in bringing a class UDRP complaint.
One such case is linked here (though in the interest of full disclosure, I’m of counsel at Rodenbaugh Law): http://udrp.adr.eu/adr/decisions/decision.php?dispute_id=100614“”
For the readers the UDRP case referred to above where over these domain names:
Of course the panel held for the Complainants and ordered the domain names transferred
2. Are you identifying typo registrations or domain names like microsoftsoftware.com which recently dropped (was not owned by Microsoft) and was re-registered by someone other than Microsoft.
“”Our algorithms are constantly improving.
What I can say is that re-registering a dropped domain containing the famous Microsoft trademark in and of itself would not necessarily cause someone to be on the Network’s radar.
However, the example you gave is a good one to consider.
If you look at the portfolio of this registrant, it appears that there are domains substantially indistinguishable or confusingly similar to many famous trademarks, including American Airlines, Google, Amazon, Android, iPad, Apple (combined with descriptive terms that are highly related to Apple’s line of business), Beats headsets, Disney, Capital One, Cialis, Costco, Craigslist, Facebook, Gucci, Hyatt, Kohls, Sears, Twitter, Visa, WordPress, Yahoo, and the list goes on and on.
If further review validated these results, it is difficult by any stretch of the imagination not to conclude that this is a serial cybersquatter.
You can’t just look at MicrosoftSoftware.com in a vacuum.
By looking at the spectrum of trademarked domains this registrant has, it is obvious we are looking at a serial cybersquatter.
People like this give domainers a bad name, and provide no value to society.
Serial Cybersquatter Detector is doing a service not only for brand holders, but to deter those relatively few bad actors that give domainers a bad rep that is undeserved.
Staying away from monetizing famous trademarks is just common sense.
And yes, there are exceptions.
While the serial cybersquatters instantly appear, we do manually review to keep the quality of the network high. We will not just file based on automated results. The idea is to empower our users through technology, not to automate decisions altogether.””
3. Your services charged on a company basis or for each brand or TM they want to track.
We are a start-up and will continue to develop our business model. But for starters, there is no charge per brand.
A company subscribes to the Network and can sign up as many of their trademarks that they want.
If you click sign up on the Network now at scdnetwork.net, you can see the subscription model we are using to join the Network.
We then have a $1k flat fee per complainant for each UDRP initiated or joined, plus the complainants share pro-rata in the UDRP costs. This will provide significant savings to participating brand owners.
4. You Talk In Your PR about getting behind proxy or privacy services to determine the true owner, how do you do that?
We are breaking new ground by leveraging the Class UDRP opportunity on a large scale, but we already won one class decision, and between Mike Rodenbaugh and myself in-house at Yahoo! and as outside counsel, well over a hundred other UDRP decisions, many of them involving abusive privacy or proxy registration services.
Typically the UDRP is brought against the domain privacy or proxy in the first instance, then the curtain will sometimes be lifted to reveal the true owner(s) of the domains.
If the privacy or proxy registration service does not unmask the true owners, then the case generally proceeds to decision against the service itself.
In other cases the privacy or proxy service provider cooperates because the registrant is violating the terms of service of the provider. So the provider lifts the curtain, and then there may be several registrants of the domains. Unless there is some evidence that they are under common control, a typical approach is to allow the case to go to decision against one of the respondents and then the complainants have a chance to bring new proceedings against the other respondents. An example of how this works is http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2010-0894.
With SCD Network, it should be much easier for brand holders to combat abusive privacy or proxy registrations.
We envision proceedings split into multiple class proceedings against multiple underlying serial cybersquatters.
Furthermore, if you look at the report that ICANN recently issued on abusive privacy or proxy registrations, it demonstrates that such registrations are likely to be abused by advance fee fraudsters, rogue Internet pharmacies, and phishing criminals–not only typo-traffic domains displaying counterfeit marks with pay-per-click ads or the like. Therefore, the data we will provide will give insights beyond just cybersquatting, and will help deal with these even more severe social problems.””
We Thank Mr. Matkowsky for taking the time to explain to our readers more about the offering and product.
We of course at TheDomains.com are not fans of domain holders that register a ton of typos and agree that they give legitimate domain investors a black eye, as outside of the domainer community, blend in the typo-squatters in with the legitimate investors.
Knowing that Mike Rodenbaugh is involved makes me feel a lot better about the offering as well as he has not only prosecuted UDRP cases against the Typo guys but he has defended domain holders again UDRP on very generic domains as well.
According to a press release out today, Maccabim.com, a “researcher and developer of cybercrime solutions to protect brands and IP assets, today announced the launch of its Serial Cybersquatter Detector (SCD) Network powered by DomainTools®
The SCD Network “instantaneously identifies both the serial cybersquatters exploiting its members’ trademarks, as well as the opportunities to either initiate or join class complaints through the platform.”
“Members thereby reduce their Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) costs, reclaiming infringing domain names or unmasking the identities of those hiding behind abusive Whois privacy and proxy registrations”
DomainTools powers the SCD Network by supplying the service with up-to-date, accurate information of domain name ownership and typo-squatting variations, as well as monitoring and tracking changes in status of identified targets.
“By leveraging the DomainTools’ API suite and integrating it into their system, the SCD Network provides a turnkey solution for brand owners to significantly reduce their UDRP costs and level the playing field against abusive Whois privacy and proxy registrations.”
Jonathan Matkowsky, the Founder and CEO of Maccabim.com is the former legal director of global brand protection for Yahoo! Inc. and chief IP counsel for Las Vegas Sands.
Personally I would like to see the program in action.
I’m concerned about any system that attempts to “instantaneously” come to any conclusions based on using pure data.
Think about Estibot type of system that attempts to value domain names on the fly, attempting to identify Serial Cybersquatters without anyone eyeballing the results.
For one what makes someone a Serial Cybersquatters?
3 UDRP loses, or 10 or 100?
Or is it just the amount of complaints?
I’m going to reach out and try to get more information on this but at first blush its seems it could spell trouble and identify people as Serial Cybersquatters in their eyes which are not in domain holders eyes.
According to a press release just out, Cyber Squared Inc. which owns ThreatConnect™, a leading threat intelligence platform, entered into a partnership with DomainTools and Farsight Security, Inc. to provide ThreatConnect users with the industry’s most powerful domain and passive DNS intelligence.
“We know that the most sophisticated and mature organizations are using our data to assess network-counterparty configuration history and associated risk, and to amplify the value of their threat intelligence data. Working with ThreatConnect means that over 2,000 global users are now able to take advantage of our services.”
Using DomainTools’ branded Reverse Whois and Registrant Alert services in ThreatConnect’s Track feature, ThreatConnect customers are able to research malicious domain registrants from the industry’s longest running and most comprehensive searchable database of domain name registration and hosting data.
With Farsight Security’s passive DNS (pDNS), the de-facto market-leading source for commercial pDNS data, analysts can pivot within ThreatConnect to discover new network indicators related to the threats they are most concerned about, providing custom context and the most relevant threat intelligence data.
DomainTools and Farsight Security data services together within ThreatConnect offer users the best DNS based threat intelligence capability on the market.
“We are continuing to expand our data services and to build an integrated platform for threat intelligence that is relevant to our customers,” said Cyber Squared CEO Adam Vincent. “Our customers are the biggest organizations out there, and they need an enterprise-level, best-in-class solution to get the most accurate and up-to-date information on Whois, DNS, and pDNS data. Whether they are investigating malware, a spear-phishing incident, DDOS, or another kind of theft or fraud, ThreatConnect is made stronger through partnerships with services from such leading organizations as DomainTools and Farsight Security.”
ThreatConnect enables analysts to engage in predictive network defense by allowing them to grow their knowledge of threats, discover new indicators, and make associations to adversaries that pose a risk to their networks. A platform such as ThreatConnect allows users to aggregate their data, then analyze it using crowd-sourced intelligence coupled with the ability to search through resources like Farsight Security’s DNSDB and DomainTools’ Reverse Whois and Registrant Alert services, resulting in an extremely powerful platform with capabilities no other company is offering today.
“Passive DNS data has become a must-have for comprehensive DNS research and effective network security forensics,” said Bert Lathrop, Chief Operating Officer of Farsight Security, Inc. “We know that the most sophisticated and mature organizations are using our data to assess network-counterparty configuration history and associated risk, and to amplify the value of their threat intelligence data. Working with ThreatConnect means that over 2,000 global users are now able to take advantage of our services.”
DomainTools data is immediately available to ThreatConnect subscribers through the Track feature.
Farsight Security’s pDNS service is available in Beta now and will be available to all ThreatConnect subscribers in mid-Q2.
Results from both DomainTools Reverse Whois and Registrant Alerts as well as Farsight Security pDNS are available to be chosen as Indicators and associated with tracked Threats or Adversaries within ThreatConnect.
For more information on ThreatConnect, please visit: www.threatconnect.com. For more information on DomainTools, please visit: http://www.domaintools.com/. For more information on Farsight Security, Inc., please visit: https://www.farsightsecurity.com/.
“Largest Domain Name Sales Database Ever Built” Launches WIth Over 315K Domains & $1,135,277,224 In Sales
According to a press release we received today the biggest domain name sales database ever built just just rolled out.
The database is at DNPric.es.
“”Currently the database has 315,461 domain name sale records totaling $1,135,277,224.00.
Not only you can lookup historic sales, the site also offers amazing stats section where you can fish for tons of interesting information.
Let’s have a quick look on it from different angles.
While .COM is still the king with more than half of the sales (this correlates with the number of domain names) other extensions are doing surprisingly well.
For instance .ME, #9, topping even .tv and .co.
Here we can narrow down the whole industry to five big players (Sedo, Moniker + SnapNames, GoDaddy+AfterNIC, TDNAM, NameJet, DomainNameSales), than another few dozens of boutiques.
We can observe that overall average domain name prices are falling in the last few years. Especially those for .COM. And then, this year it started to improve.
Interestingly, average prices for LLLLL names are higher than those for LLLL and LLL names.
Average historic price for five letter domain names (LLLLL.***) is $6,060.81.
That for LLLL is $3,641.76.
And that for LLL is $5,653.34.
It looks like names that are too short but not ultra short (two characters) have somewhat less value than those of five characters.
A paradox that intuitively I am still struggling to explain.
The longest known domain name sold is xn--private-krankenversicherung-fr-selbstndige-6sd16h.de a.k.a. private-krankenversicherung-für-selbständige.de.
Well done Sedo!”"
The database is available and accessible for free as of now.
Of course only publicly reported sales are included, which probably account for most of site developers issues regarding difference is longer domains selling for more on average than shorter domains.…
The report benchmarks the comparative safety of the Internet and its largest Top Level Domains (TLDs) by measuring by the prevalence of security threats such as malware, phishing, botnets, and spam.
The findings indicate a 67% increase of domain names identified and listed as “abusive” by major blocklists from January to September 2013, and that at least 5.5% of newly registered domain names are being used to perpetrate security threats.
“The increase in abusive use of domains is a challenge for the security and domain industries, and for the general Internet-using population.”
Report Finds Increase of “Abusive Domains” and Potential Lessons for New gTLDs
The findings indicate 67% increase of domain names identified and listed as “abusive” by major security blocklists from January to September 2013.
These respected blocklists are used to protect Internet users by blocking malware, phishing, dangerous spam, and other threats.
The majority of the domains on these blocklists were registered for the purpose of perpetrating abuse, with a small minority consisting of domains that were compromised by bad actors. From January to September of 2013, an estimated 5.5% of newly registered domains were listed. “This underscores prevalent practice of bad actors to use domain names for perpetrating security threats and then quickly moving to new ones,” said John Matson, COO of Architelos. “The increase in abusive use of domains is a challenge for the security and domain industries, and for the general Internet-using population.”
The first NameSentry Report covered January to May 2013, was released in July and pioneered the concept of the Namespace Quality Index (NQI).
NQI measures the relative concentration of abusive domain names in any given namespace, thus providing a comparative measure of safety.
Specifically, the NQI measures the “number of reported abusive domain names/million Domains Under Management (DUM).” Taking a snapshot in May and then again in September, of the 15 TLDs with NQI ratings of “Excellent/Green” in the May, only 6% or four TLDs sustained their ranking by September, while the rest slipped to “Good/Yellow.”
This demonstrates the challenge TLDs face to achieve and maintain an “Excellent/Green” rating. The number of “Good/Yellow” rated TLDs increased from 36 in number in May to 45 total in September and represented 63% or the majority of the 72 TLD studied. The number of “Caution/Orange”-rated TLDs increased slightly in number from 14 in May to 15 total in September; and the number of at “Risk/Red” rated TLDs increased slightly from 7 in May to 8 in September comprising 11% of all measured TLDs.…