Archive

Archive for the ‘halvarez’ Category

One Month Left to Accept “Halvarez” Rebate Offer from Snapnames

October 8th, 2010 Comments off

It is hard to believe that almost a year has passed since the Snapnames Halvarez Scandal. It appears none of the class action suits have materialized and there is one month left for affected bidders to accept the rebate offer presented by parent company Oversee.net. The deadline to accept this Rebate Offer is Friday, November 5, 2010.

For our previous coverage of the scandal, see the following articles:

(c) 2010 DomainNameNews.com


Advertisement

VOTE NOW for the best .INFO website of 2010 and be entered to win a FREE iPad.


Oversee Files Suit Against Nelson Brady for $33 Million in Damages

May 4th, 2010 Comments off

SnapNames, and its parent company, Oversee.net, announced today that they have filed suit against Nelson Brady in federal court in Oregon (Portland district).

Brady, a former employee of SnapNames improperly bid in certain SnapNames auctions using the bidder alias “Hank Alvarez” or “halvarez”. The company also claims that Brady also embezzled funds from Oversee by refunding himself a share of the purchase price for domain names he won through the SnapNames system.

Oversee is seeking to recover $33 million of dollars from Brady, including punitive damages. The company claims to have been making an effort to settle privately with Brady to recover losses, including the “rebates” sent to SnapNames customers effected by the activity and the funds he embezzled.

Oversee came under attack for the debacle and had faced several class action lawsuits themselves.  All parties involved by the fraudulent behavior had been offered a “rebate” check by the company.

For several months, the company has in good faith attempted to settle privately with Brady to recover its losses, including the rebate fund established by Oversee to address Brady’s activities and the funds he embezzled from Oversee.  Those settlement efforts have been unsuccessful.  According to the company officials “No amount of money, however, could compensate the damage Brady has caused to SnapNames’ and Oversee’s reputation in the marketplace.”

Company officials have sent DNN the following details of the events :

  • In October 2009, Oversee discovered an employee, Nelson Brady, using an account under the false name “Hank Alvarez,” engaged in improper bidding activities in domain name auctions on the SnapNames platform.
  • Oversee and SnapNames disclosed the situation to its customers and employees in November 2009.  Oversee made available to affected customers a cash rebate in the amount of overpayment, plus 5.22% interest (the highest applicable federal rate during the affected time period), of any amounts paid exceeding what the auction price would have been without employee bidding.
  • Since that time, more than 60% of the aggregate rebate amount has been claimed.

Brady’s conduct affected:

5% of auctions since 2005
75% of total impacted auctions were between 2005 and 2007
Less than 1% of SnapNames auctions during this period were won by the employee
The remaining 4% were won by SnapNames clients.
Brady’s bidding affected approximately 1% of SnapNames’ auction revenue during the full period.

(c) 2010 DomainNameNews.com

Advertisement
Upcoming Domain Industry Events, Conferences & Auctions


Five Previously Unanswered “Halvarez” Questions

January 19th, 2010 Comments off
I recently had the opportunity to interview Jeff Kupietzky, CEO of Oversee.net and wanted to share a portion of that interview. Below are five questions that to this point have not been answered about the SnapNames auction fraud. Tomorrow I will post the full interview with ten additional questions. Q. When did Oversee learn about bidding [...]

SnapNames Daily Update : The Sharks Begin To Circle

November 7th, 2009 Comments off

It didn’t take long for the sharks to begin circling. It’s come to our attention that class action attorneys already smelling blood in the water have begun investigating the possibility of a class-action case against SnapNamesBlim & Edelson, Chicago based class-action attorneys, have put up a website to gather up possible plaintiff names and investigate the case.

To be clear the site states :
The listing of a company is not meant to state or imply that it committed any illegal or improper act; rather only that an investigation is or was being conducted by private attorneys to determine whether legal rights have been violated.

Edelson has recently taken on Facebook, Match.com, Lycos, and a number of other internet companies.

The site further reads :

If you purchased a domain name through SnapNames since 2005, you may be entitled to recover money. Contact an attorney today!

Also, typical of the domainer crowd, both SnapNamesClassAction.com and OverseeClassAction.com have been registered.  Too bad Edelson doesn’t have an affiliate program.


(c) 2009 DomainNameNews.com

Advertisement
WE BUY DOMAINS. We are interested in acquiring your premium domains – find out more.


Users Accepting Snapnames Rebate Sign Away Right to Further Claims

November 6th, 2009 Comments off

In the recently admitted “halvarez” scandal where an employee placed bids in Snapnames domain auctions against company policy, the company has started to email details on the offered rebates – you can find a de-personalized copy of the email after the jump. By accepting the rebate and signing the release you are also signing your right away for any further claims against SnapNames.

SnapNames.com, Inc.
1600 SW 4th Ave., Suite 400
Portland, Oregon 97201

November 6, 2009

Re: Rebate Offer

Dear Customer:

On November 4, 2009, SnapNames.com, Inc. (“SnapNames”) notified customers about an unfortunate incident involving an employee bidding under a false name in certain SnapNames auctions. As we said previously, this was a clear violation of our internal policy and we regret that it occurred. In order to avoid any appearance that SnapNames benefited from this unauthorized conduct and in recognition of the importance of fair auctions, SnapNames is offering a rebate to any customer that won an auction in which this employee’s bidding activity resulted in a higher price paid by the customer. This letter provides more details regarding this rebate offer.

The account in question was named “halvarez.” Our records indicate that you won one or more auctions involving domain names in which halvarez also placed a bid. The attached Schedule I (link below) includes: (i) a list of each domain for which you were the winning bidder in a SnapNames auction in which halvarez placed a bid that affected the amount of the winning bid in the auction, (ii) the date on which the auctions for each domain closed, (iii) the winning bid price paid for such domains, (iv) the rebate amount for such domains, (v) the aggregate interest amount and (vi) the aggregate rebate amount.

Although the employee that placed bids under the name halvarez appeared to have submitted genuine bids in many auctions in which another person won, SnapNames is offering a rebate in each and every instance where this employee’s bidding had an impact on the winning bid. SnapNames is doing so to avoid any appearance of a conflict of interest on the part of the company.

How Affected Auctions Were Reviewed

To determine the rebate offer amount, SnapNames hired FTI Consulting, an independent, international forensic accounting firm, to perform a thorough review of these auctions and calculate the rebate. FTI Consulting reviewed data regarding all of the bidders in an affected auction, including the bids each bidder placed in the auction and the maximum bids the bidders indicated they were willing to place in the auction, and determined from this data what the winning bid would have been had halvarez never placed a bid in the auction. This amount was then subtracted from the actual price paid for the domain name to determine the amount of the rebate for that auction.

Calculation of Rebate Offer Amounts

In situations where a customer competed in the auction against only halvarez, the rebate offered is the difference between the winning bid and the opening bid for the auction, plus interest. This calculation assumes that were it not for the bidding by halvarez, the client would have won the name with the opening bid. In situations where there were other bidders in addition to the winner and halvarez, FTI Consulting reviewed the bidding history for each auction, as well as any indications by other bidders regarding the maximum bid they were willing to submit in the auction, to determine what the winning price would have been had halvarez not participated in the auction. For example, if the winner paid $100 for the domain, halvarez had bid $90, a third person’s maximum bid was $80, and the minimum bid increment was $5, then FTI determined that the winner would have won the auction at $85 were it not for the bidding by halvarez. Thus, the rebate offered for this auction would be $15, i.e., $100 minus $85, plus interest.

The Rebate Offer

In your case, SnapNames has concluded that had halvarez not placed a bid on any of the auctions you won, you may have paid less for the domain names you purchased at auction. Therefore, SnapNames is offering you a rebate for this amount plus interest, calculated at the rate of 5.22%, compounded annually, which is the highest value of the 1 month constant maturity treasury rate during the applicable period. This rate is established by federal law.

The rebate is available, at your option, in cash or as a credit to your SnapNames account. (Please note however that credit to your SnapNames account will be available only if the rebate amount, including interest, is $59 or higher. If the amount is less than $59, your rebate will be offered in cash.) Although we don’t currently anticipate doing so, we may impose other restrictions on the issuance of account credits, to satisfy legal or accounting requirements.

This offer is dependent upon your executing and returning to Rust Consulting, Inc., a third party administrator that is assisting with the administration of this rebate offer, the accompanying Rebate Offer Acceptance Agreement (link below) which, among other things, waives any claims you may have against SnapNames and its affiliates relating to this matter. This offer is open for twelve months from today’s date. If the offer is not accepted within this time frame, then the rebate will no longer be available.

If you have questions or concerns regarding the rebate calculation or other aspects of this offer, please contact Rust Consulting by telephone at 1-888-413-5338 or by e-mail at snapnamesrebate@rustconsulting.com. Please be prepared to provide detailed information and data regarding your bidding and purchase activity to the extent that it differs from the information we have provided to you.

Under certain circumstances we may be required to report the interest paid to you to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). To permit us to satisfy any reporting obligations, your receipt of payment or credit from SnapNames pursuant to this offer may be conditioned on your providing us with a properly completed and executed IRS Form W-9 (or, for non-U.S. persons, an IRS Form W‑8BEN or other appropriate version of Form W-8), or such other materials that may be required to enable us to comply with applicable tax laws. If so, we will provide you with further information. You are urged to consult your tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income and other tax consequences to you that may result from this offer.

Processing Your Rebate Offer

In order to process your rebate, please execute and return the Rebate Offer Acceptance Agreement and send it to the following:

SnapNames Rebate Administrator
P.O. Box 98
Minneapolis, MN 55440-0098

If you so elect, you may contact Rust Consulting to print and mail you a copy of these forms, along with a self-addressed stamped envelope. Rust Consulting can be reached by telephone at 1-888-413-5338 or by e-mail at snapnamesrebate@rustconsulting.com Please provide your current mailing address with your request. Upon receipt of your Rebate Offer Acceptance Agreement and after verification of your eligibility, Rust Consulting will provide your rebate check (or confirm application of account credit) by mail.

Again, SnapNames regrets that its policies were not followed and that any of its customers may have been inconvenienced by this matter. SnapNames thanks you once again for your continued business.

Sincerely,

Jeff Kupietzky Craig Snyder
President and CEO General Manager, SnapNames.com

(c) 2009 DomainNameNews.com

Advertisement
We will sell your domain porfolio for 14-48 months revenue. $16MM sold in the last 3 years. More information.


SnapNames User Name “Halvarez” Was Nelson Brady, VP of Engineering Bidding on Domain Names [Updated]

November 4th, 2009 Comments off

SnapNames[Updated] According to a statement from Oversee.net’s SnapNames, an employee was found to have bid in 5% of their auctions since 2005 and in some cases arranged for a partial refund of the sales price after winning an auction. DNN also confirmed the bidder as Nelson Brady, the VP of Engineering. He was bidding under the username “halvarez”.

In a statement issued today, the company offers compensation to any potentially affected customer:

To avoid any question about whether the company benefited from this conduct, SnapNames will offer a rebate to impacted customers, including 5.22% interest (the highest applicable federal rate during the affected time period), of the difference between the prices they paid in winning auctions, and the prices they would have paid had the employee not bid in the auctions. Impacted customers will be notified by SnapNames or its representative with instructions for the offer of a rebate.

SnapNames also has taken further action to ensure its policies regarding auctions are followed, and the company remains committed to taking whatever action is necessary to protect the integrity of its auction platform.

SnapNames deeply regrets this situation and is committed to addressing its customers’ needs quickly and fairly.

Customers with questions may contact SnapNames at support@snapnames.com or via phone at +1 (866) 690-6279 (toll-free in the U.S.) and +1 (503) 241-8547 (outside the U.S.). The company has also posted a FAQ on their website.

The employee has been dismissed from the company and SnapNames is further investigating the incident.

For years, the domain community has questioned specific bidding practices by at least one frequent bidder with the user name “halvarez” . Forum posts have questioned and speculated on this bidder’s unusual activity for many years and SnapNames officials confirmed today that this user name is indeed the internal employee.  We now also know that the employee was the VP of Engineering, Nelson Brady, as confirmed by a spokesperson of the company. . . .

AMAZING !

Adam Strong also contributed to this post.

(c) 2009 DomainNameNews.com

Advertisement
WE BUY DOMAINS. We are interested in acquiring your premium domains – find out more.