Archive

Archive for the ‘verisign’ Category

Verisign Issues Statement On ICANN’s Move & Is Down Over 5% In Pre-market

March 17th, 2014 Comments off

Verisign logo

VeriSign, Inc. VRSN today provided a statement on the National Telecommunications and Information Administration’s (NTIA) announcement of its intent to transition key Internet domain name functions.

Verisign shares are down over 5% in pre-market activity trading at just over $52 a share.

Here is Verisign’s announcement:

“”The announcement by NTIA on Friday, March 14, 2014, does not affect Verisign’s operation of the .com and .net registries. The announcement does not impact Verisign’s .com or .net domain name business nor impact its .com or .net revenue or those agreements, which have presumptive rights of renewal.

The NTIA announcement involves Internet functions that are entirely different functions from those Verisign performs under its .com and .net agreements. The functions performed by Verisign involved in the NTIA announcement have been performed as a community service spanning three decades without compensation at the request of the Department of Commerce under the Cooperative Agreement”…

Categories: External Articles, ICANN, verisign Tags:

Verisign Answers ICANN’s Name Collision Study With Its Own Blog Post

February 26th, 2014 Comments off

Earlier today we told you that ICANN Published A Study On Mitigating Risks Of Name Collisions from new gTLD domain names.

Tonight Verisign  published an answer to the study ICANN.

On its company blog Verisign, in a post entitled “Uncontrolled Interruption? Dozens of “Blocked” Domains in New gTLDs Actually Delegated”, Verisign in part says:

The report “centers on the technique of “controlled interruption,” initially described in a public preview shared by Jeff Schmidt last month.”

“With that technique, domain names that are currently on one of ICANN’s second-level domain (SLD) block lists can be registered and delegated for regular use, provided that they first go through a trial period where they’re mapped to a designated “test” address.  ”

“The staged introduction of new SLDs is intended to provide operators of installed systems the opportunity to assess the potential impact of an impending name collision on their own, before any external operators have an opportunity to exploit it.”

“If this technique (or any other) were adopted, it would stand to reason the staged introduction would need to be monitored carefully. ”

” Someone would need to check that SLDs on the block lists actually did go through the trial period, and were not put into regular use without the appropriate opportunity for assessment by operators of installed systems.”

(Note that Verisign isn’t endorsing the technique; we are reviewing the just-published Mitigating the Risk of DNS Namespace Collisions report, and we’ve already expressed reservations about the statistical invalidity of SLD block lists as an indicator of name collision risk.  That being said, the point still remains that if such a technique were adopted, it would need to be monitored to ensure correct implementation.)

“Given the anticipation of “controlled” interruption, it’s ironic that while ICANN specifically precludes the delegation of domain names on the SLD block lists, dozens of them were actually registered and delegated!”

“That fact was recently duly noted by one of Verisign’s researchers who has been analyzing the daily progress of new gTLDs.  As it turns out, nearly all delegated SLDs that should have been blocked were cancelled over the past weekend after independent reports citing the existence of inappropriate delegations began to circulate.:

:That the delegations of SLDs on the block lists could have caused name collisions with installed systems is not our primary concern.  (And, as noted above, we don’t consider the block lists – which are based solely on query frequency at specific points in time – to be the final word on which delegations might or might not cause name collisions.

Verisign Is Not Being Transparent on Their Policy With Regards to Short .TV Domains

February 8th, 2014 Comments off

Verisign logo

Back in December Mike wrote about how GM.tv and 13.tv were being held back and reserved by Verisign.

At the time Verisign said they were holding these back for promotional purposes. In the past Verisign did this with a few other short .tv domains like G.tv.

Domain Name: G.TV
Domain ID: 97041820
Updated Date: 2012-05-10T18:50:28Z
Creation Date: 2011-05-27T04:01:07Z
Expiration Date: 2021-05-27T04:01:07Z
Sponsoring Registrar: .TV RESERVED DOMAINS
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 9998
Domain Status: SERVER-UPDATE-PROHIBITED
Name Server: No nameserver
DNSSEC: Unsigned delegation

So a couple weeks back HD.tv was supposed to drop and the same thing happened. I called Verisign but the person on the phone did not want to speak about it and wanted me to email the marketing department.

Here is that back and forth:

Dear  Raymond,

Thank you for inquiry regarding reserved .TV Domains. .TV reserved domains are domains that are not available for purchase because these domains are reserved. These domains are reserved at the registry level for use in specialized promotions aimed at generating significant brand awareness and adoption of the .tv tld. Please visit the following link for more information regarding .TV domain names.

Jaipal
Customer Service
Verisign

I know what reserved domains are, I am asking are you going to reserve all L and LL.tv domains ? Like you reserved Gm.tv and Hd.tv. Right now Fa.tv and Tw.tv are in redemption, will they be reserved ? Thank you

Raymond,

Thank you for contacting Verisign Support.  Unfortunately we do cannot disclose what domains may or may not be reserved in the future.  Those decisions will be made by the appropriate teams within the company when they determine there is a need or reason to do so.

If you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best Regards,

Phil
Customer Service
Verisign
VerisignInc.com

So now I have another person replying, Phil, to which I asked, So what you are saying is you are not holding back all L.tv and LL.tv domains that are dropping ? I want to know if any will drop you should be able to answer that question.

Raymond,

Thank you for contacting Verisign Support.  Unfortunately that information is not available to the public.  We cannot tell you if a domain will be reserved or not. We apologize we cannot assist you with any addition information on this.

If you have additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Best Regards,

Phil
Customer Service
Verisign

This is getting borderline ridiculous, I am asking you is there policy where Verisign is now holding back all L.tv and LL.tv either you are or you aren’t.

Categories: .tv, External Articles, verisign Tags:

Verisign CEO: “I Don’t See Anybody Who’s Going to Abandon The .Com For a New gTLD

February 6th, 2014 Comments off

The CEO and President of Verisign James Bidzos had some pretty interesting comments regarding the new gTLD’s and the effect they may have on .com and .net registrations during its earnings call today.

I have listened to the last several Verisign earnings call and this is the first time I can remember an analyst asking a pointed question about the new gTLD’s and their effect on the .com and .net registry.

The question was asked by JP Morgan Chase & Co:

Any thought to whether the gTLD program, whether people coming in for new sites might actually be thinking about an alternative gTLD for .com? And maybe that’s having some sort of impact?

D. James Bidzos, Founder, Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Verisign:

“”As far as the new gTLD program, I don’t think that, I don’t see anybody who’s going to abandon the .com for a new gTLD.

There’s a lot of strong anecdotal evidence that, that may not be the case.

I can give you an example. So, for example, you may have seen that the U.K. paper, dailymail.co.uk, a very typical English configuration for a web address, using a company that U.K. configuration.

So dailymail.co.uk purchased dailymail.com.

They said that they purchased it because they wanted something that was more global that would allow them to get more traffic, especially in the U.S.

They paid GBP 1 million for it.

They bought it from The Charleston Daily Mail of Charleston, West Virginia, a 100-year-old Pulitzer Prize winning newspaper, who after they got their roughly $1.6 million for that domain name, were free to go out and buy whatever they wanted.

Then they chose to go out and buy CharlestonDailyMail.com.

If they bought it for retail, they probably paid about $10 for it.

So I think .com is very much the preferred, established reliable name.

I don’t know what’s going to happen in the future with the TLDs.

I’m sure some of them will do well, they’ll build some community.

But I guess I can give you one data point. If we look back, this is not the first time this has happened.

There have been some new TLDs before, and one of them that I think actually is a good idea of what success what might look like, a good example would be .co.

And I’m sure a lot of you are familiar with it.

.co is a short name, it’s just 2 letters.…

Categories: External Articles, verisign Tags:

Versign Reports: 127.2 Million .Com/.Net Domains, Revenue up 10%; Has $1.7 Billion In Bank &

February 6th, 2014 Comments off

VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ :VRSN ) reported financial results for the fourth quarter of 2013 and year ended Dec. 31, 2013.

VeriSign, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Verisign”) reported revenue of $246 million for the fourth quarter of 2013, up 7% from the same quarter in 2012.

The operating margin was 53% for the fourth quarter of 2013 compared to 58.8% for the same quarter in 2012.

Verisign reported net income of $292 million and diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $1.94 for the fourth quarter of 2013, compared to net income of $106 million and diluted EPS of $0.65 in the same quarter in 2012.

Financial Highlights

Verisign ended the fourth quarter with cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $1.7 billion, an increase of $167 million from year-end 2012.

Cash flow from operations was $147 million for the fourth quarter of 2013 and $579 million for the full year 2013 compared with $171 million for the same quarter in 2012 and $538 million for the full year 2012.

Business Highlights

Verisign Registry Services added 1.29 million net new names during the fourth quarter, ending with 127.2 million active domain names in the zone for .com and .net, which represents a 5 percent increase over the zone at the end of the fourth quarter in 2012.

In the fourth quarter, Verisign processed 8.2 million new domain name registrations for .com and .net as compared to 8.0 million for the same period in 2012.

During 2013, Verisign processed 34.0 million new domain name registrations as compared with 33.1 million for 2012.

The final .com and .net renewal rate for the third quarter of 2013 was 72.7 percent compared with 72.5 percent for the same quarter in 2012.

Renewal rates are not fully measurable until 45 days after the end of the quarter. Non-GAAP Items…

Verisign: Rise In Value Of Bitcoin Causes Surge In .Com/.Net Domain Registrations: 22K In 2013

January 23rd, 2014 Comments off

Verisign just published a blog on how the rising value of Bitcoin has led  to surge of .com and .net domain name registrations.

 

The value of a Bitcoin surged from roughly $13 at the beginning of 2013 to an eventual high of $1,137 at the end of November (The chart below, courtesy of Coinbase, documents the ebbs and flows of a Bitcoin’s value).

 

 

 

By doing a search of the word “bitcoin” for the past six months, it is fairly easy to see a correlation between the two Bitcoin price surges shown above and surges in domain name registrations including the term “bitcoin” in the grapher results below.

 

 

It is interesting to see that despite the relative modesty of the April price surge when compared to the November/December surge, daily registrations for both instances peaked at roughly the same number: 490 and 472 respectively. That being said the density of the two domain registration surges in the graph show that significantly more domains were registered as Bitcoin approached its all-time high.

 

Did you register any Bitcoin related domain names in 2013? Are you planning to register some in the new year? Let us know in the comments below!…

Categories: .com, External Articles, verisign Tags:

Verisign: .Com Registrations Blow Past 112 Million Mark For The 1st Time

January 16th, 2014 Comments off

Screen Shot 2014-01-16 at 3.40.05 AM

Verisign is reporting that the number of .Com domain names in the active zone file exceeded the 112,000,000 Mark for the first time.

The number of .com domain name registrations in the active zone crossed the 112 Million number today January 16th, 2014

The number of .net domain names in the active zone file is down slightly but still well over the 15 million domain name mark.

 …

Categories: .com, Domains, External Articles, verisign Tags:

Verisign Is Taking Back Expired Two Letter & Two Number .TV Domains

December 27th, 2013 Comments off

Verisign logo

Verisign the registry for the .TV registry is apparently taking back any expired new Two letter (LL.TV) .TV domain names as well as any two numbered (NN>TV) domain names.

Recently a domainer that had a back order on a two letter .Tv domain and a two numbered domain received this notice from Verisign:

“Thank you for contacting Verisign Support. I reached out to our Operations team to determine where they were in their investigation. They have a resolution for the issue prepared. However, the business team has concluded that both 13.TV and GM.TV will be placed into Reserved status upon their deletion.

They will not be able to be registered by any registrar once that takes effect.

They are reserving these domains at the registry level for use in specialized promotions aimed at generating significant brand awareness and adoption of the .tv tld.

I do apologize for the inconvenience, I know you wanted to register these names.”"

You can now see that the domain names have in fact been taken back from the whois:

Domain Name: 13.TV
Domain ID: 108626603
Updated Date: 2013-12-25T04:04:39Z
Creation Date: 2013-12-25T04:04:39Z
Expiration Date: 2023-12-25T04:04:39Z
Sponsoring Registrar: .TV RESERVED DOMAINS
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 9998
Domain Status: SERVER-UPDATE-PROHIBITED
Name Server: No nameserver
DNSSEC: Unsigned delegation

Could Verisign do the same thing with a two letter expired or a two numbered .net expired domain name?

What would stop them?…

Verisign Publishes Last Part Of Series On Possible Domain Collision: “SLD Blocking Is Too Risky Without TLD Rollback”

November 21st, 2013 Comments off

Verisign Published its final part of its 4 part series on domain collision and the new gTLD program entitled  “SLD Blocking Is Too Risky Without TLD Rollback”on the final day of the ICANN Meeting in Argentina.

Here it is:

“ICANN’s second level domain (SLD) blocking proposal includes a provision that a party may demonstrate that an SLD not in the initial sample set could cause “severe harm,” and that SLD can potentially be blocked for a certain period of time.

The extent to which that provision would need to be exercised remains to be determined.  However, given the concerns outlined in Part 2 and Part 3 of this series, it seems likely that there could be many additions (and deletions!) from the blocked list given the lack of correlation between the DITL data and actual at-risk queries.

If the accumulated risk from non-blocked SLDs were to become too large, it could become necessary for ICANN to withdraw the entire gTLD from the global DNS root.

Changes to the DNS root, once properly approved and authorized, can be implemented rapidly by updating the root zone file and notifying root server operators that a new zone file is available.

This part of the process is as straightforward for deletions as for additions.

The approval and authorization process, however, would need to be much faster for a deletion than it currently is for an addition because of the urgency of making the change or “rollback” after a determination was reached that a gTLD’s delegation needed to be revoked.  The importance of rapid delegation is affirmed in Recommendation 3 of SAC062:  Advisory Concerning the Mitigation of Name Collision Risk, published Nov. 7 by ICANN’s Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC):

Recommendation 3: ICANN should explicitly consider under what circumstances un-delegation of a TLD is the appropriate mitigation for a security or stability issue. In the case where a TLD has an established namespace, ICANN should clearly identify why the risk and harm of the TLD remaining in the root zone is greater than the risk and harm of removing a viable and in-use namespace from the DNS. Finally, ICANN should work in consultation with the community, in particular the root zone management partners, to create additional processes or update existing processes to accommodate the potential need for rapid reversal of the delegation of a TLD.

For similar reasons, the DNS resource record TTLs for a new gTLD needs to be managed carefully to minimize residual effects that may occur should a problematic TLD delegation be removed.…

Categories: External Articles, verisign Tags:

265 Million Domains: We Asked What Happened To The Verisign Report & Tonight Verisign Answered With The Numbers

November 15th, 2013 Comments off

Earlier today we asked what happened to the Verisign Quarterly  Domain Name Industry Brief that has been missing for 2013 and tonight Verisign answered us.

In in a post on the company blog Verisign releasing an series of three infographics showing that current worldwide domain name registrations sit at 265 Million domains as of the end of the 3rd quarter of 2013, up from 252 million reported by Verisign as of December 31, 2012.”

In the blog post Verisign writes:

“Today Verisign announced that we are updating the Domain Name Industry Brief (DNIB) and a new version of the DNIB is expected to be released in the first quarter of 2014.”

“With the Internet continuing to evolve in new ways, we have been evaluating how best to align the DNIB with that evolution so it better addresses the interests of our readers and expands the scope of the trends we’re tracking. ”

“We remain committed to continuing to provide informative content on the latest industry trends that are most relevant to our readers.”

“Along with this announcement, we have also released infographics containing select DNIB data for the first three quarters of 2013

Here are the infographics and we at TheDomains.com appreciate  the quick response

domain-name-industry-brief--q1-2013_528694728c57b_w587

 

domain-name-industry-brief--q2-2013_528694fa1a2a3_w587

 

domain-name-industry-brief--q3-2013_52869583aaec5_w587

 …