Archive

Archive for the ‘.XXX’ Category

Compete.com Says XXX.com Traffic Doubled Since The .XXX Launch

January 23rd, 2012 Comments off

With hundreds of new right of the dot, gTLD extensions being applied for, I though I would take a look at the most recent extension, .XXX and see what effect it was having on the traffic of XXX.com

According to Compete.com traffic on XXX.com has doubled since the launch of the .XXX extension in December.

According to Compete XXX.com had around 100K visitors a month, each month for 2011 up until November the month that Sunrise and LandRush applications were due.

In December when .XXX officially launched traffic on XXX.com doubled to over 200,000 Visitors according to Compete.com

I know a lot of domainers believe that there will be a substantial amount of traffic leakage to the a matching .com to a new gTLD extension.

In case your wondering, it appears XXX.net got no such boost according to Compete.com

XXX.co also saw a doubling in traffic in  but it still gets under 1K visitors a month according to Compete.com

We will have to keep an eye on this,  but for holders of great generics or geo’s .com’s which may become its own extension in the next few years, it looks like they may have a lot of extra traffic to look forward to.

Categories: .XXX, Domain Industry, External Articles Tags:

ICM Responds To Manwin’s .XXX Suit With Motions To Dismiss

January 22nd, 2012 Comments off

ICM filed its repose to the lawsuit filed by Manwin Licensing International, S.a.r.l. (“Manwin”) and Digital Playground, Inc. (“DP”), which was recently acquired by Manwin, asking the Court to throw out the case.

Manwin operates various adult websites including YouPorn.com

ICM asks the court to hold a hearing on its Motion to Dismiss on April 2nd.

We have read through the 31 page memo in support of ICM’s Motion to Strike and here are the highlights:

“The Complaint here is nothing more than a transparent and ironic attempt to use the antitrust laws to eliminate a new internet platform for adult content—.XXX—that Plaintiff Manwin perceives as posing unwelcome competition to its dominant .com adult-entertainment empire.”

“Given that context, it is not surprising that not only are their various antitrust theories internally contradictory, but Plaintiffs do not even make a serious attempt to allege the requisite elements of their claims.”

Even though the Complaint itself recites the long and frustrating history of ICM’s efforts to secure approval for the .XXX Top-Level Domain Name (“TLD”), despite repeated ICANN rejections of its application and the absence of sustained interest from any other bidders, Plaintiffs nevertheless contend that ICM and ICANN were conspiring to eliminate competition for the establishment of adult-oriented TLDs and .XXX registry services during this same period.”

“Similarly, although it is well-established that the antitrust laws exist to protect the competitive process and not the profit streams of individual firms, it is clear from the Complaint that Plaintiffs’ real concern is with the competition to their .com websites that may be posed by rivals offering adult content via .XXX domain names—a business in which neither ICM nor ICANN participates.”

“But it is the proposed remedy for these purported violations that really exposes the baselessness of Plaintiffs’ claims and their ulterior motives in bringing this action.”

“Presumably because they cannot show any damages from the challenged conduct, Manwin and Digital Playground instead seek sweeping and unsupportable injunctive relief “enjoining the .XXX TLD altogether,” voiding the ICM-ICANN contract “and/or” imposing price and other restrictions on the offering of registry services.”

“Plaintiffs make such requests even though they cannot identify any authority requiring ICANN to insist on competitive bidding or contractual price constraints in contracts for new TLDs and acknowledge that ICANN’s operations (including its recommendations for new TLDs and registry contracts) are subject to review by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“DOC”).”"

“”Unfortunately for Plaintiffs, under the Supreme Court’s most recent formulation of the pleading standard in antitrust cases, they must do more than merely assert the existence of Sherman Act violations to get past a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

Categories: .XXX, External Articles, Legal Tags:

Afilias: .XXX Breaks 200K Domains Under Management: A Look Inside The Numbers

January 18th, 2012 Comments off

According to Afilias the company that provides the back-end operations for the .XXX registry, .XXX broke 200,000 domain names under management today.

According to the report I received,  .XXX now has 200,295 domain names in the system.

According to Registrarstats.com there are only 110K domain in the root.

I reached out to Stuart Lawley CEO of ICM registry which operates the .XXX registry to ask about the why the numbers reported by Alifias differ so drasticlly differ from RegistrarStats.com numbers:

“”Names that are NOT in the zone file are names without any associated name servers ( as in all TLDs) and in our case the names may have name servers but the ” membership token” has not been issued by us yet or has not been ” associated” with the names at Registrar level.”"

So domains under management but not added to the Root would include those registered under the TM blocking period, those domains that are subject to a Land Rush or Sunrise action which are still ongoing, and those reserved or restricted by the registry.

We know the registry reserved some 1,400 premium domain names.

We also know that ICM reserved thousands of domain names of celebrities and politically sensitive domains so that they could not be registered.

My guess is there are around 60K+ blocked domains or domains purchased by companies or institutions that just wanted to protect someone else from registering a matching .xxx domain.

However and to be perfectly  clear,  that is just my guess, based on the number of domains under management compared to the domains in the root taking into account the land rush/ Sunrise  auctions, domains reserved and restricted by the registry and the domains that are registered but still aren’t associated with a membership token.

All registries file monthly reports with ICANN but when I check yesterday the lastest reports on ICANN sites were for September, which is no help with .XXX since the extension didn’t launch until December.

 

 

Categories: .XXX, External Articles Tags:

1st Six Figure Domain From .XXX Landrush/Sunrise Auctions

January 14th, 2012 Comments off

According to Stuart Lawley the CEO of the ICM registry the company that operates the .XXX TLD, there has been a sale in a Sunrise or Landrush auction for a .XXX domain name into the six figures

According to Mr. Lawley comment made on thedomains.com to a post, the landrush or Sunrise auction wound up at $121K.

Although Mr. Lawley did not identify the domain name, he gave a clue:

“”First wave of auctions closed , highest auction figure for closed auction was yesterday , eight character name for $121,000

Next wave of announcements coming soon”

Mr. Lawley also states that there are now  over 198,000 .XXX domains under management since launch and 110,000 since December 6th.

$121K For a .XXX closed auction is certainly a nice sale.

I will be interesting to see what the domain is once its announced.

The highest closed auction I have on my board is CamChat.xxx which closed at just over $5K

 

 

Categories: .XXX, External Articles Tags:

Has .XXX Caused The Value Of Non.com Adult Domain To Decline? Shocker as Sexy.org Sells for $7,500

January 13th, 2012 Comments off

Yesterday I saw the sale of the domain name Sexy.org cross the Sedo.com wire for a mere $7,500.

Ouch.

Sexy is without a doubt a great word for an adult or semi adult site.

Its right below words like sex and porn and certainly well above 2% of the value of those words.

It was just a few years ago that both sex.net and porn.net sold well into the six figures $425K and $350K if memory serves.

At $7,500 Sexy.org well to say the least was a good buy, unless the existence of the .XXX extension has taken a lot of juice out of non .com adult domains.

Its impossible to make a call on just one domain but the price of $7,500 for Sexy.org is pretty shocking and it could well be related to the existence of the .XXX. extension.

If so, as the new gTLD’s roll out it could be a wake up call for other non.com’s in verticals that will have new gTLD’s

For example will a domain like Maineattorney.org be worth the same as it is now once there is a .law extension?

Will NewYorkPizza.org or .net be worth as much once there is a .NYC and maybe a .pizza?

 

 

 

Categories: .XXX, External Articles Tags:

.XXX LandRush/Sunrise Auctions Start Today

January 3rd, 2012 Comments off

The auctions for Sunrise/Land Rush .XXX domain names started today.

An auction was scheduled if more than 1 application was submitted either during the Sunrise or Land Rush period for the same .XXX domain.

I do not believe ICM, the company that runs the .XXX Registry, has ever released a statement as to how many of domain names are in such auctions.

At Worldwide Media, Inc. we are in 96 of these auctions so we should have a pretty good idea of how they are going.

The auctions are all handled by Pool.com and like the .Co and .Me auctions the closing time will be extended in the event a bid is placed within a day of the closing date.

For now the first auctions end on January 10th 2012

Share

Categories: .XXX, External Articles Tags:

cnet.com Chats About .XXX Domains & Gets It Wrong

December 27th, 2011 Comments off

Cnet.com just published an article about .XXX domain names chatting about what domain names were taken and which are still available.

The problem is the article is incorrect.

The article entitled “These .XXX domains are ready to Hook Up”

The article cites such domains like Alabama.xxx and Nashville.xxx “are available to be registered for $100 a year”.

However they are not.

Before we blame the author of the report or the reporter, it looks like ICM could have done a better job on its whois reporting.

If you use the whois command off the Apple terminal lets call it the raw whois data (that is how I typically check the whois) those domain name show as “not taken”,  but if you check the ICM Registry whois directly, you will see both domains are pending in either a sunrise or land rush auction.

If you check the ICM site’s whois this is the message you get:

This name will be awarded after an auction.
Click xxxauctions.pool.com for more information”

As you know if there was more than one application was submitted during either the Sunrise or Land Rush period the domain goes to an auction.

However apparently whois on certain programs are returning a false positive.

The cnet.com article goes on to list hundreds of other domains that appear to be available, including Cornell.xxx and Salon.xxx just to name a couple more so many of the domains that appear to be available are not and are awaiting auction.

 

 

Share

Categories: .XXX, External Articles Tags:

What Percentage of .XXX Domains Are Defensive; Two Stories Out Today: One says 48% The Other 83%

December 22nd, 2011 Comments off

So what portion of .XXX domain name registrations were defensive that is purchased or registered to either block the domain name or for other reasons that to use the domain actively in the adult space.

Two stories are out on the topic today.

According to one report,  the registrar 123-reg.co.uk says that  “48% of registrations weren’t from those in the porn industry at all, but regular businesses hoping to protecting their brand and reputation.”

The story does not say how the registrar came up with that percentage.

According to a separate story today, NameNewsletter.com, says they ran a report based on the .XXX Zone File and concluded that “83% of the total registrations are defensive (inactive). The runners-up are default registrar name servers like Godaddy or Enom. These account for roughly 6%. ”

“The .xxx TLD can be said to be much more defensive than speculative.”

“Two specific name servers immediately stand out with 83451 domain names assigned to them: nsb2.icmregistry.net and nsb1.icmregistry.net.”

“These are the name servers for reserved (protected) domain names (example: Disney.xxx).”

“Domain names using these name servers resolve to a standard placeholder page provided by the registry.”

“These two name servers alone account for a staggering 83% of the whole zone file.”

I know for a fact that some .XXX domains that have been purchased still have ICM servers on them for example Orgy.XXX which we purchased with partners at TRAFFIC still have ICM servers and would be included by this report as “defensive registrations”.

Also I’m not sure how the Sunrise domains that are subject to auctions that start in January are treated in the Zone file either.

ICM has not supplied any stats on defensive registrations

We do know that there were around 80,000 sunrise applications which included applications for Trademarked domains and trademark blocks but also including matching existing domain names in other extensions and we don’t know the break down of those.

Of course other companies including a many colleges registered defensive .XXX registrations after Sunrise as well.

 

Share

Categories: .XXX, External Articles Tags:

How Much Traffic is Buy.XXX Losing To BuyXXX.com? We Know The Exact Numbers

December 19th, 2011 Comments off

We have written pretty frequently  about ICM’s launching of an all out ad campaign for the .XXX extension,  with all Advertising leading back to Buy.XXX.

You can read some stories on Buy.xxx here, here and here.

So for the 1st time we can tell you EXACTLY how much traffic Buy.xxx is bleeding over to BuyXXX.com

How do we know?

We own the domain name BuyXXX.com.

Yesterday we logged in over 2,000 visitors to BuyXXX.com.

Since the advertising campaign started on November 23rd BuyXXX.com has received over 25,000 visitors and traffic is increasing daily.

Actually this past weekend the domain got over 5,500 visitors.

Based off of ICM numbers,. the traffic they are losing to Buyxxx.com is quite insignificant to what’s they are getting to Buy.xxx,  but still we are still thankful.

Before the ICM ad campaign the domain had no traffic whatsoever.

According to Compete.com we aren’t the only one’s benefiting from some extra traffic courtesy of .XXX

The big winner is of course XXX.com which saw its traffic basically double from last November (the extension wasn’t approved until March 2011 and didn’t officially launch until December).

According to Compete last November the site did only 77K visitors and last month hit just short of 150K visitors (we believe both numbers to be woefully short of actual numbers)

So maybe the lesson here is even if you don’t invest in the new gTLD’s, that doesn’t mean you can’t make money off of their success.

Share

Categories: .XXX, Domains, External Articles Tags:

ICM Registry Suspends TM Domains Including BusinessWeek.xxx, cnbc.xxx, VerizonWireless.xxx, WashingtonPost.xxx

December 13th, 2011 Comments off

According to a Press release by the ICM Registry, the official registry of the new .xxx top-level domain TLD, ICM “announced that as part of its investigation of reported cybersquatting by a handful of individuals, it has suspended registrations that appear to involve unmistakable, blatant cybersquatting in violation of the Registry’s policies and the Registry-Registrant Agreement”

“The suspended registrations include patterns of abusive registrations for names like businessweek.xxx, cnbc.xxx, geocities.xxx, nextag.xxx, snapfish.xxx, verizonwireless.xxx, washingtonpost.xxx, and gayroom.xxx, amongst others.”

“In announcing this action, ICM’s CEO, Stuart Lawley, reiterated the Registry’s commitment to enforce its policies.

“ICM Registry has raised the bar on responsible registry operations and we intend to maintain the highest standards.  We will not tolerate nefarious conduct and will exercise our right to take appropriate action when we detect widespread repeat patterns of cyber-squatting activity.  Would-be cyber-squatters are on notice neither ICM Registry nor the .xxx community will be complicit in the theft or abuse of intellectual property. ICM takes a stand to facilitate user choice and parental control, protect the privacy, security, and consumer rights of consenting adults, fight child abuse images, and protect intellectual property,” said Lawley.”

“While cyber-squatters try to take advantage of legitimate rights owners in every TLD (from .com to .edu), ICM’s CEO, Stuart Lawley noted that the rights protections built into its agreement with registrants gives the Registry a number of innovative tools to combat malicious conduct and protect the .xxx TLD space.  In addition to its authentication policy, which makes it harder for cyber-squatters to hide, the Registry also makes a variety of innovative tools available to prevent and address abusive registrations, including a Rapid Evaluation Service (“RES”) to take immediate action on clear abuse of well-known, distinctive registered trademarks or service marks of significant commercial value, or of personal or professional names of individuals, and its Charter Eligibility Dispute Resolution Process (“CEDRP”) to resolve challenges to registered names in the .XXX TLD based on alleged use inconsistent with the qualifications for registration.  ICM Registry recently conducted a ground-breaking Sunrise process that enabled rights-holders to permanently remove their brands from availability for a cost-based one time fee.”

“Working with its sponsoring organization, the International Foundation for Online Responsibility (“IFFOR”), ICM has implemented a comprehensive and rigorous set of policies designed to protect third party rights and combat malicious conduct.  The IFFOR Policy Council, which includes representatives from the adult industry as well as experts in the areas of free expression, privacy, and child advocacy ratified the Registry’s baseline policies, including its policy prohibiting the registration of  “strings that infringe the intellectual property rights of a third party, including common law trademark rights; strings that are obvious variants of well-known trademarks not belonging to the registrant; first and last names of an individual other than the individual or his/her agent or names that suggest the presence of child abuse images.”  All registrants in the .xxx domain must agree to abide by those policies when they register .xxx names.”

I think this is an unprecedented move by a Registry.

Personally I’m not aware of a Registry pre-emptively suspending domain names even those that seem to be clear trademark  infringing domain names.

In previous launches some TM domains actually went to Land Rush auctions and sold for big bucks and we questioned why registries should profit from the premium sale of TM domains as in the case of Toyota.me which sold for $90,000

Share

Categories: .XXX, External Articles Tags: